I’d like to see what y’all think about this new 9-11 theory.

Posted at 12:34 pm by Johnny B

Posted by Name @ 06/12/2005 05:02 PM PDT
Well, the theory that the US government was complicit in the September 11 attacks is not , in fact, NEW. Read the book entitled “The New Pearl Harbor”. There are too many facts in this book that are irreconcilable with the official version of the September 11 attacks. The Defense Policy Board, whose members include Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld et al, wrote a paper called the “Project for the New American Century” in 98 or 99 which basically suggested to get the American people to foot the bill for a huge increase in military spending there needed to be a perceived threat and a catastrophe on the order of Pearl Harbor … Ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall the usual BS reasons for starting wars, like fighting communism or spreading democracy and peace (through warfare ,lol) have needed replacements, as the “bewildered herd” have started to wake up. The only factual content of Johnny B’s linked theory was the lack of Israeli and Jewish victims of 9-11. One may visit CNN’s website which contains the exhaustive list of 9-11 victims. The Jerusalem Post was flooded with calls the day of 9-11 from Israelis whose family members worked at the World Trade Centers. These people were very concerned for their family members. When the actual list of victims came out, it turned out even though there were high numbers of Israelis working at the WTC’s, there was actually only one Israeli victim. The question then surfaced how did so many Israelis not show up for work that day. Well, some people argue that they were warned by an Israeli messaging service. I find this argument plausible. The MOSSAD had , in fact, warned the US intelligence apparatus that they had received chatter on a big attack in NYC. The Germans also warned us, as well as the Egyptians. The US did nothing , such as beef up air defenses for the week (which was specifically identified) , as well as other precautions. So if the MOSSAD saw the US intelligence apparatus not heed its warnings, why would they not issue warnings to Israeli citizens working there. Some people argue that the warnings to Israelis constitute MOSSAD involvement …. I doubt that, given the shaky footing the MOSSAD was on with respect to US institutions. In fact, on September 10, 2001, SAMS (a US military think-tank) issued a warning on the MOSSAD, in the WAshington Post, calling the Israeli intelligence group ruthless, cunning, able to attack US targets while making it seem like an Arab attack. That said, I seriously doubt the MOSSAD had anything to do with the attacks itself. It is clear they had prior knowledge. US intelligence had multiple warnings. Yet nothing was done. In fact, the single biggest argument for US government complicity in the 9-11 attacks is the lack, supreme lack, of air defenses over the most populous and strategic areas of the US. The biggest military might in the world did not protect these areas? There is a standard operating procedure with planes that , number 1, have veered off course, and number 2, have failed to maintain radio contact. US fighter planes are deployed within 3-5 minutes of both 1 and 2 occuring simultanesouly. It is a myth that it takes presidential authority to shoot down a plane. Rumsfeld or higher could, in fact, authorize military fighters to shoot down aircraft. But the scrambling of these aircraft is AUTOMATIC. The first plane that hit the WTC was in the air for more than 45 minutes ….. More than 38 minutes had passed since the plane veered off course and radio contact was lost. This piece of data is very damaging to the OFFICIAL version. Cheers all.

Posted by JohnnyB @ 06/12/2005 05:08 PM PDT
The new aspect is the vatican angle
Posting without comment
Tagged on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *